RE: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
> Behalf Of Sam Hartman
> Fundamentally, though,
> it is their desire to have interoperability that drives them
> to work with the IETF. That is the only power we have.
Ergo the attempt to force Sender-ID to use v=2.0 in order to create an
unnecessary interoperability failure is utterly doomed to failure.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
