![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
In message <17167.14936.141345.6653 at chiark.greenend.org.uk>, Ian Jackson writes : > >Sorry to be pejorative, but as a DNS implementor[1] I'm amazed to find >senior IETF/IESG people seriously contemplating the kind of namespace >confusion which is fundamental in the LLMNR protocol design. > What I find amusing is so many people asking the IESG to overrule a WG's judgment, given how many people have complained about the IESG's power to do exactly that. I haven't checked for overlap between the two groups... --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.