Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard



In message <17167.14936.141345.6653 at chiark.greenend.org.uk>, Ian Jackson writes
:

>
>Sorry to be pejorative, but as a DNS implementor[1] I'm amazed to find
>senior IETF/IESG people seriously contemplating the kind of namespace
>confusion which is fundamental in the LLMNR protocol design.
>

What I find amusing is so many people asking the IESG to overrule a 
WG's judgment, given how many people have complained about the IESG's 
power to do exactly that.  I haven't checked for overlap between the 
two groups...

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.