Re: IESG powers


On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Frank Ellermann wrote:

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
(I am not referring to our own process BCPs in this
statement.)
Please consider to split BCP vs. "meta / admin" documents.

I agree. There needs to be new track for IETF standardization work & procedures.

--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william at elan.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG powers
  - From: Frank Ellermann

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.