Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size (long)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size (long)



I wrote:

> 3.  The proposed initial registry contains subtags based only on the
> existing standards: ISO 639-1 and 639-2, ISO 3166-1, ISO 15924, and
> United Nations M.49, as well as "variant" and "grandfathered" subtags
> based on the RFC 3066 registry.

Should have been:
"variant" subtags and "grandfathered" tags

There is no such thing in the draft as a grandfathered subtag.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/





_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.