Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

[Peter Dambier <peter at peter-dambier.de>]

bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> 	LLMNR has waded through the lengthy IETF standardization
> 	process to get to where it is.  That Microsoft has been patient and spent
> 	the money needed to keep people on this task long enough to get it here
> 	should be rewarded with the IETF imprinture.  Of course even Microsoft has
> 	hedged its bets (even they are aware of the need to ship products) wrt
> 	LLMNR.  But that is no reason for the IETF to not sanction this work.
> 	
> --bill

How about a protocol to remotely control the explosion of bombs. It could
even be built on top of LLMNR. It is not necessaryly more harmful than
LLMNR. Nobody intends to build bombs anyhow not to mention remotely explode
them. So would you consider publishing this protocol harmful?

Terrorists - I am sorry, weapons researches have spent a lot ...

We should really reward them by publishing this parodicol :)

Is that what you meant?

Regards
Peter

--
Peter and Karin Dambier
Public-Root
Graeffstrasse 14
D-64646 Heppenheim
+49-6252-671788 (Telekom)
+49-179-108-3978 (O2 Genion)
+49-6252-750308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
+1-360-448-1275 (VoIP: freeworldialup.com)
mail: peter at peter-dambier.de
http://iason.site.voila.fr
http://www.kokoom.com/iason


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf