Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt

[SM <sm at resistor.net>]

At 19:31 28-08-2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> The IETF *is not in the business of* "document the contact point for 
> problems concerning a domain". That duty is left to registry 
> operators, who have a whole apparatus (ICANN) for making it possible 
> to figure out how to do that. And they can ask to have such specs 
> published as RFCs if they want to - it's been done before; examples 
> include RFC 1875 ("UNINETT PCA Policy Statements"). But ICANN hasn't 
> done that, so no policy related to any *current* domain 
> administrator is on the record.

Thank you for the clarification.  It is more informative than what is 
written in the draft.

> Status UNKNOWN seems like a fine status to keep, in my opinion. 
> Status INFORMATIONAL

That's my opinion too.

Regards,
-sm 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf