Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt

[SM <sm at resistor.net>]

At 02:47 29-08-2005, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> It is already historic and most information in it is plainly wrong:
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; HOSTMASTER at SRI-NIC.ARPA

I was referring to the use of Whois information to identify a point of contact.

> The rest, as mentioned by Harald Alverstrand, is just policy
> requirments (and bad ones) which are NOT IETF business.

The draft makes no mention of policy requirements as the reason for 
the change in status.  The reply sent by Harald Alverstrand offers a 
clearer explanation for this draft.

Regards,
-sm



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf