Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard



Peter,

Peter Dambier wrote:
Russ Allbery wrote:

Margaret Wasserman <margaret at thingmagic.com> writes:


Other than a few minor issues that are being dealt with in a -43 update,
I don't think that anyone has raised a blocking technical issue with the
LLMNR specification during this IETF LC.  If you (or anyone else) has
intended to raise a blocking technical issue, either with LLMNR itself
or with its ability to coexist with mDNS, please make that clearer to
me.



Sorry I overlooked this:

I dont count 25% of the root server traffic a minor issue.

Can you point to publicly available data about the rate of .local queries to *all* the root servers (including the anycast servers)?

     Brian


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.