Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard



Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 13:14 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
Check for only "K": http://k.root-servers.org/index.html#stats
Interresting one here is NXDOMAIN responses:
http://k.root-servers.org/stats/linx/xstats_SNXD-all.html
(note, that is only the LINX node)
It is a large part of the traffic and annoying, 0.763 k out of 2116 k
queries/sec.

That is about 1/3 of the total. It doesn't surprise me at all that so many bogus queries arrive - everybody who mistypes a TLD or misconfigures a default domain generates bogus queries, and this isn't going to change. The question is whether .local is a *significant* part of this load. The limited data I have suggest not, but I'd like to see publicly available data: what fraction of those NXDOMAINs are due to .local?

    Brian


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.