Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
>
> The LLMNR document already includes an informative reference to
> draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-05.txt, but it does so rather obscurely
> (citing a need to use a TTL of 255 for "compatibility with Apple Bonjour").
That doesn't make sense. Why does LLNMR need to be compatible with a
separate protocol?
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
