Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
Dave Singer wrote:
The whole idea that 'real DNS' can arbitrarily pre-empt local name
resolution seems, well, wrong, and needs serious study for security
implications for the services using those names, no?
The whole idea that local names should look like DNS names and be
queried through the same APIs and user interfaces seems, well, wrong (or
dubious at best), and needs serious study for the implications of
applications using those APIs and the impact of such names on DNS, no?
IMO, local names and a lookup service for local names would be extremely
useful, but neither the names nor the query interface should look much
like DNS - the names should look different because otherwise there's too
much potential for confusion with DNS names, and the query service
should look different because local name lookup service probably can't
make the same kinds of consistency or stability assurances that DNS does.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.