Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...)
At 20:30 01/09/2005, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Here's a philosophical question for you: is it right to force a
philosophy on people?
Dear Iljitsch,
I started that debate with Harald in 2000 at the DNSO/GA over the
understanding of "global". This mares many issues. Harald says "yes",
I say "no", but I understand the need of "yes" on occasions, when the
users want it and for transitions. Like in the Roman constitution.
Why not once for all gather all the cons and pros and call for an IAB
guidance to get documented if the Internet is a directive system or
not, or can be distinctly both, at the same time, or at distinct
times. I think it can be both if the concerned areas are clearly defined.
For example, could classes help in this case to create a real but
crossable boarder? I don't know, just an hint to address the security concern.
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.