Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents

["Doug Ewell" <dewell at adelphia.net>]

John C Klensin <john dash ietf at jck dot com> wrote:

> Then an instruction to the RFC Editor could be included in the
> I-D asking that they not publish the initialization document
> until the entries have been made in the IANA registry and then
> that the list of entries be dropped and replaced with a pointer
> paragraph and reference.  That would lead to an RFC that was
> clearly informational and fairly short, saving everyone
> long-term problems.

The whole purpose of draft-initial is to serve as the vehicle by which
the initial registry contents are transmitted to IANA.  That was what
the co-chairs and group thought best.  There would be no need for a
separate initialization document otherwise.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf