![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Spencer Dawkins wrote:
This was quite funny - both of you!
Of course, the first thing to do when you want to lose "complexity" is "Stop adding to the problem" (as in "Put down the fork and push away from the table...").
Oh..darn ..you mean I cant have a Session Border Controller for dessert ?
Grumble Grumble ..< burrrrrp>
See you in Vancouver,
Spencer
From: "Richard Shockey" <richard at shockey.us>
To: "Pekka Nikander" <pekka.nikander at nomadiclab.com>
Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol
Pekka Nikander wrote:
In a whimsical mood, I put up a web page that tries to clarify the comments that I made about complexity during the Paris IETF Thursday plenary. So, for your bed time enjoyment:
http://www.tml.tkk.fi/~pnr/FAT/
Pekka this is a outstanding piece of work and I would suggest an alternative thesis that fits your model.
"Why IMS is similar to grotesque body fat --- the case for cranial liposuction among IMS engineers"
"Compulsive IMS ...how to reckgonise the problem and how to treat it"
"Bulimia networka ( aka IMS ) is defined as a period of uncontrolled definition of network elements. The network designer places up to10,000 boxes in an archichectural design . Bulimia networka is commonly associated with excessive attendance at industry conferences and standards bodies ( Stockholm Syndrome ) followed by purging behaviors, i.e., service provider bankruptcy, layoffs, etc.
I'm sure we can expand on the model endlessly...
--Pekka Nikander
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.