Re: ISMS working group

To: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: ISMS working group
From: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:47:24 +0200
Authentication-results: imail.cisco.com; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( message from cisco.com verified; );
Cc: Margaret Wasserman <margaret at thingmagic.com>, Ken Arnold <arnold at moonhill.org>, ietf at ietf.org, iesg at ietf.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=306; t=1126544409; x=1126976609; c=nowsp; s=nebraska; h=Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=Subject:Re=3A=20ISMS=20working=20group| From:Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com>| Date:Mon,=2012=20Sep=202005=2018=3A47=3A24=20+0200| Content-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1| Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit; b=Ze7TdZhg6nkY7ehlt/t3lBas6iUpGxCpd8xI6Qa9Csl9nkkUpLdmoPAuLzN9HQLxdhcZKIsi 9bZ8K935Nfqk45gG6CUs8wFuMmBLrZTmdzhoXgUdUI4OoeZWedxfzruvpi4PtgxsVMpzhIz/KL3 ++lxvZpooUPG46M2FuD3ncNY=
In-reply-to: <4325A9A0.3080501@cisco.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <431DD59A.4000400@ofcourseimright.com> <AE6514F0-4714-4A48-9F56-A155823489F2@moonhill.org> <p0620074bbf44d3d23a6d@[192.168.2.7]> <432531CB.3070109@cisco.com> <p062007e1bf4b28530a35@[192.168.2.7]> <43257A17.1050101@cisco.com> <p062007e2bf4b2b3db8dc@[192.168.2.7]> <4325A9A0.3080501@cisco.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716)

Uch... I wrote:

Eliot Lear wrote:
> And I've repeatedly responded with
> two reasons why this work should continue in a single working group:
> 
> 1. [security considerations]
> 
> 2. [security considerations].
> 

The second reason is the reason mentioned elsewhere in the message, that
turning the crank should be done only once on this...

Sorry for the confusion.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- ISMS working group
  - From: Ken Arnold
- Re: ISMS working group
  - From: Margaret Wasserman
- Re: ISMS working group
  - From: Eliot Lear
- Re: ISMS working group
  - From: Margaret Wasserman
- Re: ISMS working group
  - From: Eliot Lear
- Re: ISMS working group
  - From: Margaret Wasserman
- Re: ISMS working group
  - From: Eliot Lear

Prev by Date: Re: ISMS working group
Next by Date: RE: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol
Previous by thread: Re: ISMS working group
Next by thread: Re: ISMS working group
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: ISMS working group

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.