Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>]

On 13-sep-2005, at 14:32, Pekka Nikander wrote:

> So, as I state in my little web page, I think we really should work  
> hard to create a new waist for the architecture.   I, of course,  
> have my own theory where the new waist should be and how it should  
> be implemented,

Well, don't be shy: where can we absorb these insights?

(As far as I can tell the "architecture" that so many IETFers ignore  
is "anything that doesn't cause too much visible breakage goes",  
against which resistance is exactly the right response.)

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf