Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)]



Generally, the existence of an assignment authority does encourage
its (proper) use - mostly for the reason you state above. Just as "nobody will want to accept an official registration polluted by prior use", "nobody" (deliberately in quotes) will want to attempt to establish an unofficial registration using the approach you've
described. Doing so is - at the very least - going to adversely
affect popularity and is very likely to result in interference and
potentially even litigation.

"litigation"?

Do we have prior art that this is a likely result?

Spencer, honestly confused (for once)...

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.