RE: A question regarding IETF appointments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: A question regarding IETF appointments



 
> In addition, BCP 10 (RFC 3777) in no way limits the 
> NomCom from selecting sitting ISOC Board members to be on the 
> IAB or IESG.

I think it would be best to avoid having ADs on the BoT,
as they are overworked already, and (should be) focused on producing
the protocols we need now.

However, there is substantial overlap between the functions
of IAB and BoT members. Both need to be concerned with maintenance
and growth of the Internet, evolution of its basic architecture,
and cooperation with other SDOs. Having IAB members on the ISOC
BoT furthermore ensures someone is looking after the IETF's interests
(e.g. standardization and openess of protocols).

So I recommend restricting IESG members but encouraging
the appointment of IAB members.

Y(J)S

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.