RE: [dean at av8.com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [dean at av8.com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list]



 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: smb at cs.columbia.edu [mailto:smb at cs.columbia.edu] 
> 
> In message <200509271059.GAA29066 at ietf.org>, "Nick Staff" writes:
> >
> >> ]
> >> ] 7.2 Approval to block participant on a WG list (Bert
> >> Wijnen) ] ] This management issue was discussed.  The IESG agrees 
> >> that Bert ] Wijnen may block posting rights for Dean 
> Anderson on the 
> >> dnsops ] mailing list if he refuses to stay on topic as 
> per the list 
> >> rules.
> >> 
> >> which raises the question, "Why are we even discussing this?"
> >> 
> >> --
> >> John Leslie <john at jlc.net>
> >> 
> >John-
> >
> >Could you please specify the RFC that details the procedure 
> for when an 
> >AD requests that the IESG remove someone's posting 
> privileges from the 
> >IETF list (the RFC other 3683 of course).  If there isn't 
> one then I'd 
> >have to ask that you refrain from making wildly unsupported 
> claims as 
> >they are disruptive to the process.
> >
> 
> Have a look at 3934.
> 
> 		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
> 
Steve,

I might have misunderstood it, but I thought 3934 only pertained to
suspension from a Working Group list and that since David's request included
suspension from the main IETF list that it fell under 3683?

nick


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.