![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, John C Klensin wrote:
Brian,
This is a fine document. Perhaps appropriately, it doesn't say much of anything.
Is the actual trust agreement a secret, or does the IETF and IASA intend to make it public before the IESG approves it? Will there be an IETF Last Call that includes an opportunity to review the document itself?
The actual document is still in review and and the on-going discussions are privileged as they invole outside parties. I've just sent a summary of our framework to the list (you anticipated me by a few minutes). The document falls under the "contracts or equivalent instruments with outside organizations" and IPR related duties of the IASA as outlined in section 3 of BCP 101 and as I understand this section is not subject to IETF Last Call.
We are making our best efforts to relay information as it becomes available.
Understood and appreciated.
I note that the IASA web pages don't mention this at all except for a paragraph under "Draft Agreements". That says
> Proposed IPR Trust > The IAOC received on May 5th a new draft Trust Agreement > from CNRI and is in the process of preparing a response. > The IAOC expects that a revised Trust Agreement will be > sent to CNRI in early June
See the regular minutes posted here: http://koi.uoregon.edu/~iaoc/2.html
And is presumably a bit out of date, given comments in the monthly report you circulated. And, referring to that report, it also discusses new draft engagement agreements with Counsel and other draft agreements which are not mentioned on the IASA web site, much less available there.
again, please see the minutes.
I am sure all of this is fine, but the agreement with the community when IASA was formed was that all of these things would be public to the extent possible. To the extent to which few or none of them appear to be available, and the IASA/IAOC does not seem to be able to keep its own web pages current and the community informed that way, rather than via just overview monthly reports, I think it should be a matter of concern to all of us.
we are working within the confines of "to the extent possible" and hope to be able to share the document soon.
Thank you. john
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.