Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process
From: grenville armitage <garmitage at swin.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:12:15 +1000
In-reply-to: <200509300100.VAA26686@ietf.org>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200509300100.VAA26686@ietf.org>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511


I, for one, welcome our new,
"everyone must be heard multiple times and feel good"-bearing overlords.

Oh. This isn't a slashdot discussion? My bad.

gja
(feeling grumpy)


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RE: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process
  - From: Nick Staff

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.