unack'ed nomcom volunteers?

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: unack'ed nomcom volunteers?
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:10:20 -0400
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Ralph's call for volunteers says:

> I have e-mailed acknowledgments to those from whom I have already
> received offers to participate in NomCom 05.  If you think you've
> already responded, but did not receive an acknowledgment, please let
me
> know.

I've volunteered, but have not received an ack.

					- Bill



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Prev by Date: Re: a new DNS root for the world?
Next by Date: Re: a new DNS root for the world?
Previous by thread: Re: [PWE3] Last Call: 'IANA Allocations for pseudo Wire Edge to Edge Emulation (PWE3)' to BCP
Next by thread: RE: [PWE3] Last Call: 'IANA Allocations for pseudo Wire Edge to E dge Emulation (PWE3)' to BCP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

unack'ed nomcom volunteers?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.