Re: Anyone not in favor of a PR-Action against Jefsey Morfin
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Anyone not in favor of a PR-Action against Jefsey Morfin



In message <BF6B06A8.149F%mshore at cisco.com>, Melinda Shore writes:
>Messages like "I'm for this" or "I'm against this" seem to be taking
>the form of a vote, when it seems to me that what's probably more
>appropriate would be an attempt at persuasion.
>

Thank you.  I'm just as uncomfortable with the "let's sign a petition 
against the PR action" as I am with the "let's sign a petitition for 
it" postings.

I'm not opposed to PR actions in general; in fact, as a WG chair, I've
(successfully) asked my AD to suspend someone's posting privileges.
I've also had occasion to warn people that they face such sanctions, 
most recently today.  If someone is being disruptive and won't stop, 
after repeated warnings, I confess I don't see an alternative.  

Note that I am not expressing any opinions for or against any specific 
suggestions.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.