Re: Anyone not in favor of a PR-Action against Jefsey Morfin

["Marshall Eubanks" <tme at multicasttech.com>]

Now I, for one, find this annoying. Order 100+ messages to the list, a host of people declaring
themselves for or against, two petition drives on-line, and all for  an "informal" request for a
PR-Action ? That would all presumably have to be repeated under a Last Call ? Which will occur at
some point (presumably at least one IESG meeting, or at a minimum 2 weeks) after a formal request ?
At this rate, we'll be wasting list bandwidth on this until Christmas.

I would suggest that, as Harald posted his "intent to file" message back on August 29th, OVER
one month ago, there has been enough debate, and Harald should either file or publicly announce that
he is not going to file. 

In other words (to quote our Chair from another context), I would ask for a guillotine on this
matter.

Regards
Marshall


On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:40:52 +0200
 Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com> wrote:
> Folks, let's be clear about procedure here.
> 
> If the IESG receives a formal request under RFC 3683,
> we are obliged to make an IETF Last Call and listen
> to the responses.
> 
> But as of now, we have not received such a request in
> the case of JFC Morfin.
> 
> In terms of RFC 3683, nothing has happened yet in this
> case.
> 
>      Brian
> 
> Bill Manning wrote:
> > 
> > i for one, am not in favor of a PR action against anyone.
> > 
> > --bill
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf at ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf