 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry I didn't read these calm well thought out comments before I responded to some of the other posts. -Tom > > Hold on. > > To put it bluntly, you and some others have changed the topic > to: we don't like RFC 3683. > > Now, that RFC is a BCP that was duly approved after IETF last > call etc. But the code has never been tested until the IESG > recently received a request to take a PR action against > somebody - and we are still working on that request, i.e. > trying to execute RFC 3683 for the first time. > > If we believe in rough consensus and running code, it would > seem reasonable to wait a bit before discussing whether or > not we like RFC 3683. > > Brian >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.