![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
In message <BF6B06A8.149F%mshore at cisco.com>, Melinda Shore
writes:
>Messages like "I'm for this" or "I'm against this" seem to be
taking
>the form of a vote, when it seems to me that what's probably
more
>appropriate would be an attempt at persuasion.
>
Thank
you. I'm just as uncomfortable with the "let's sign a petition
against
the PR action" as I am with the "let's sign a petitition for
it"
postings.
I'm not opposed to PR actions in general; in fact, as a WG
chair, I've
(successfully) asked my AD to suspend someone's posting
privileges.
I've also had occasion to warn people that they face such
sanctions,
most recently today. If someone is being disruptive and
won't stop,
after repeated warnings, I confess I don't see an
alternative.
Note that I am not expressing any opinions for or
against any
specific
suggestions.
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf
mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.