Re: On PR-actions, signatures and debate
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On PR-actions, signatures and debate



Frank Ellermann wrote:
Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:


There are no objective standards for obnoxious, abusive, or
disrespectful speech.


My personal subjective limits are (among others) attempts to
involve the _employer_ of a poster on an IETF mailing list by
private mails - but I don't see how RfC 3683 could help with
this issue, besides one "obnoxious person" might have decided
that this was a really bad idea.  Sometimes optimistic, Frank

One thing I've learned from this set of threads is that (after we have dealt with the current formal requests for PR actions), it would be good to use that running code experience to improve the guidelines for what constitutes unacceptable mailing list behaviour. I won't start that here and now, but I believe it is quite possible to be more specific and clearer than the existing RFCs - even though ultimately there will be a judgement call involved.

   Brian


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.