![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Eduardo Mendez wrote:
> If the US law permits this
[...]
It's an unusual detail in an RfC that was never before used.
"US law" doesn't enter the picture - at least not about this
now fixed procedural nit.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.