Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

[Dave Singer <singer at apple.com>]

Eduardo,

I think I may be misunderstanding you, and if so I apologize.  As I 
understand it, the original announcement of the 'last call' was not 
sent in strict accord with the agreed procedures, in that it used the 
wrong mailing list.  As a result it has now been sent to the correct 
mailing list.  There was then a question "should the deadline -- the 
end of the call -- be as originally announced, or should it be 
extended?"  It seems, I think, that it is only fair that it be 
extended, in case there were people who did not see the first 
announcement.  This gives all parties at least the required time to 
discover the last call, read, and respond if they wish.

I think you are arguing that the original deadline should have been 
maintained, that it was in fact unfair to extend it, but I am not 
sure I understand why you feel this.  If this is how you feel, could 
you explain?  And if I am wrong, could you correct me?

Many thanks,
--
David Singer
Apple Computer/QuickTime

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf