Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

[Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>]

Hi,

I can agree with SHOULD and SHOULD NOT, the only problem i had in  
writing it that way is i could not meet the specification requirement  
for specifying the conditions under which the requirement would not  
apply.  I did not want to careless create loopholes.

My main concern is that these issues be a formal requirement of the  
community's decision in where we meet.  And that they be taken  
seriously.

a.
On 17 okt 2005, at 21.50, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Avri" == Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> writes:
> >     Avri> - MUST NOT be held in a country whose visa requirements are
> >     Avri> so stringent as to make it impossible or even extremely
> >     Avri> difficult for some participant to attend.
> > I think this is too strict.  I think visa criteria are an issue, but
> > saying that visa criteria prevent one participant from attending  
> > seems
> > way too strict.
>
> More generally, any non-trivial set of MUST NOTs is going to be
> impossible to satisfy simultaneously. I really don't see how we can
> go further than should/should not, in practical reality.
>
>    Brian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf