![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi,
I can agree with SHOULD and SHOULD NOT, the only problem i had in writing it that way is i could not meet the specification requirement for specifying the conditions under which the requirement would not apply. I did not want to careless create loopholes.
My main concern is that these issues be a formal requirement of the community's decision in where we meet. And that they be taken seriously.
Forgive me Avri and Jordi, but why?
Eliot
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.