RE: WG Action: Conclusion of Credential and Provisioning (enroll)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: WG Action: Conclusion of Credential and Provisioning (enroll)
At 10:49 AM -0300 10/25/05, Gray, Eric wrote:
However, I am starting to think that it might not be
a bad idea for <whoever> to ask the contact person(s) if
they might have anything to add. If nothing else, it might
reduce the number of times they get contacted simply to
find out why the WG "has concluded".
Fully agree. I'm one of the co-chairs of the WG that triggered this
thread, and I would be happy to have given two sentences of
explanation. ("The WG could not agree on the basic definitions of the
terms in our charter. There is lots of other work being done, both
inside and outside the IETF, that matches the definitions that some
WG participants thought were the ones we should be using.")
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.