![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 11:51, Eliot Lear wrote: > Looking at the snippet of the RFC queue you provided, the draft blocked > on a normative reference to draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis, which entered > the queue in April. It references a bunch of other stuff, but they're > all earlier in the queue, and I don't think they're blocked. I think > Bill Fenner has a tool somewhere that graphs this stuff. A recent datapoint .. a different set of documents which entered the RFC editor queue on April 5 2005 with no external dependencies entered the AUTH48 state last night, along with a couple documents they unblocked which had been in there somewhat longer. - Bill _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.