![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Steve, I'm not suggesting that technologists should duck responsibility. But I really think there are better fora. In fact, that's one of the reasons I've always supported the ISOC in its wider role.
As Ned pointed out, a lot of our technology -- especially, but not only, security technology -- can't be divorced from its societal asepcts. When I advocate strong cryptography, I'm certainly protecting passwords. But am I also protecting privacy, or am I hindering investigations into terrorist organizations? Is OPES a way to localize content or is it a way to enable censorship? Will charging for email -- or rather, the protocols for doing so -- help stop spam, or will it cut off the third world from the net?
Amorality among scientists, engineers, and technologists has gotten the world into a lot of trouble. I prefer to think about the consequences of what I do.
Harald
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.