Re: Oops

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>]

--On tirsdag, november 01, 2005 08:13:26 +0100 Frank Ellermann 
<nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote:

> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> > I'm told that my recollection is faulty
>
> It's not, that breach of RfC 2418 chapter 4
> caused two of the three pending appeals.

to be accurate:
the message that MARID was concluded did contain information about why.

<http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg00505.html>

WRT pending appeals, these are listed on

<http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Appeals.html>

The two appeals do not concern directly MARID's closing, although one might 
surmise that if MARID had been successful, this mess would have been less 
messy.

                  Harald (just reading public notices)


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf