RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org



On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:24:51AM -0800,
 Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker at verisign.com> wrote 
 a message of 36 lines which said:

> The problems with HTML are almost entirely the result of people
> trying to give the author control over the final format which is
> none of the author's beeswax.

BTW, does anyone who knows IETF and the RFC-editor function better
than I do, can tell why RFC 2629 is not the mandatory official format
for RFC, even now after six years?

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.