draft-rescorla-dtls-05.txt

To: ekr at rtfm.com
Subject: draft-rescorla-dtls-05.txt
From: Rob Dugal <RDugal at certicom.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:51:37 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, tls at ietf.org
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

How does DTLS handle datagrams containing application data that are lost or delivered out of order?
The draft seems to indicate that only handshake messages are subject to re-transmission, timeouts, and re-ordering.

-----------------------------------------------
Robert Dugal
Member of Development Group
Certicom Corp.
EMAIL: rdugal at certicom.com
PHONE: (905) 501-3848
FAX : (905) 507-4230
WEBSITE: www.certicom.com

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TLS] draft-rescorla-dtls-05.txt
  - From: Eric Rescorla

Prev by Date: Re: [TLS] Last Call: 'ECC Cipher Suites for TLS' to Informational RFC
Next by Date: Re: Vancouver schedule
Previous by thread: Re: [TLS] Last Call: 'ECC Cipher Suites for TLS' to Informational RFC
Next by thread: Re: [TLS] draft-rescorla-dtls-05.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

draft-rescorla-dtls-05.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.