![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Rob Dugal <RDugal at certicom.com> writes: > How does DTLS handle datagrams containing application data that are lost > or delivered out of order? > The draft seems to indicate that only handshake messages are subject to > re-transmission, timeouts, and re-ordering. That's correct. The philosophy here is to provide an interface that's as much like that provided by normal datagram transport protocols as possible. Those protocols don't take care of this stuff for application data, so neither does DTLS. -Ekr _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.