Re: Vancouver schedule

[Eric Allman <eric at sendmail.org>]

--On November 10, 2005 6:54:00 AM -0800 Pete Resnick 
<presnick at qualcomm.com> wrote:
> I think the problem with this schedule (as against Paris) is that
> lunch is at the old early time (1130-1300), but dinner is at the
> new later time. I *much* prefer the Paris schedule , with lunch
> later *and* dinner later, to either the current schedule or the old
> one. If they had reasonable refreshments earlier in the afternoon,
> I could live with this schedule.

I'll add my agreement to this.  I find that lunch is so close to 
breakfast that I'm often not particularly hungry, but either (a) end 
up starving by the afternoon break, causing me to gorge on the empty 
calories, or (b) eat lunch even though I'm not hungry and then nod 
off in the early afternoon.  Either way it's bad for digestion, 
health, and attention span.  If we moved lunch from 11:30 to 12:30 I 
would be a much happier puppy.

eric

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf