RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

To: <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
From: "Yaakov Stein" <yaakov_s at rad.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:38:53 +0200
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
Thread-index: AcXpP2ond3y8VpQcT4m2rZkYZJ3C7gACsA6g
Thread-topic: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

 
> It just struck me as odd that people were grousing about ASCII's
appearance when PDF is available.  

People will stop complaining when the ASCII version is allowed to say
"see diagram in the PDF version".

Y(J)S

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
  - From: Stewart Bryant

Prev by Date: Re: Vancouver schedule
Next by Date: RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode
Previous by thread: draft-rescorla-dtls-05.txt
Next by thread: Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.