Re: email "Common Operating Group"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: email "Common Operating Group"



On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Keith Moore wrote:
>
> I haven't seen a need to include transit operations in either case, and
> to me it seems like that would make it muddier.  The whole assumption
> behind discouraging third-party relaying is that a mail network should
> only process messages that were either originated from within that
> network, or intended for a recipient within that network.  This
> implies that "transit" operations - which I take to mean a relay by an
> MTA that has no relationship with either the originator or the
> recipient - are discouraged.

I think by "transit operations" Dave means things like alias-forwarding
and mailing list explosion.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.