Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

To: Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu>
Subject: Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:01:24 -0800
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, Stewart Bryant <stbryant at cisco.com>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W1Nr7tIBYZxYlGP1Pq7Rsu79MBcAaFBlZYAsYtZg9oi0JgzYWoh4QAtcaPY55WDuNyt2tpAbwDH3DgQv1v73f5sOFZ0E8N+sevGMzjKcaYHkZzZQ1WwwVW3D651ffJiJEHcnrAZa/z9W62Kn10vohv/cjR/pP0Yb7tVHR63dcMc=
In-reply-to: <43791442.7030402@isi.edu>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200511142105.NAA18386@gra.isi.edu> <43790152.2050207@cisco.com> <43791442.7030402@isi.edu>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

On 11/14/05, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> Where's the modern, WYSIWYG, outline-mode capable editor?
> And does one exist that's free?

Still a work in progress, but see
http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/xml2rfc-xxe/ .  Outline mode is high
on my todo list (I have one working that only does top-level sections,
but haven't gotten it working showing all sections yet.)

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
  - From: Bob Braden
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
  - From: Stewart Bryant
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
  - From: Joe Touch

Prev by Date: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00
Next by Date: Re: email "Common Operating Group"
Previous by thread: Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
Next by thread: Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.