RE: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org



smb writes:
> >I've been pondering change tracking, in the context of copy-editing,
> >but I haven't come up with a complete thought yet.
> >
> 
> CVS?  Should the Secretariat make CVS archives available to WG 
> document editors?  I've written a book and many joint papers via CVS; 
> it works very well for line-oriented ASCII input, whether XML, LaTeX, 
> nroff, or what have you.
> 

I think such a service would be a GREAT service for our WGs and document
editors/authors. Has the tools team looked at it at all?

Bert

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.