Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion

[Marshall Eubanks <tme at multicasttech.com>]

I agree with Geoff.

My theory is, if the projector bulb blows out  the  second before you  
go on, and the
spare is also dead (you'd be surprised how common that is), you  
should be able to get
your points (or, at least the most important ones) across regardless.

If all there is is sharing of ppt and pdf, might as well do it by   
email.

Marshall

On Nov 15, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:

> At 01:50 PM 12/11/2005, John wrote:
> > To avoid extra overload from the co-chairs during the session, and  
> > if we
> > want to make it more strict, if any of the presenters is not done  
> > with
> > his/her slides, he will not be able to talk.
>
>
> "more strict"????
>
> sorry, but that's just not on - if all we are these days as a  
> meeting is a powerpoint  pack swap session, then we may as well  
> pack up all this ietf stuff and all go away right now!
>
> I appreciate that powerpoint does enable complex concepts to be  
> conveyed with some ease, and that it (and its functional  
> equivalants) is in heavy use these days, but I would be very  
> worried if we get to a state that Jordi appears to be advocating  
> where  a) powerpoint is a mandatory precondition for presenting at  
> a WG meeting and b) you must present according to a previously  
> deposited and circulated powerpoint script. We all do our best in  
> terms of priorities, schedules and network stability to get this  
> material up prior to a WG session, and sometimes it all works, and  
> sometimes, despite our best of intentions, it does not.
>
> Geoff
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf