![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Phillip,
Steve
Steve Crocker steve at shinkuro.com
On Nov 17, 2005, at 10:09 AM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
If we want to enforce simpler, more accurate design the best way to do
this would be to require a formal proof of correctness before accepting
a specification.
Requiring people to use 1960s technology is not a way to achieve simplicity.
-----Original Message----- From: ietf-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Masataka Ohta Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 8:30 AM To: Yaakov Stein Cc: ietf at ietf.org; Stewart Bryant Subject: Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
Yaakov Stein wrote:
It's good that protocols needing more than 72 ASCII characters are forbidden.
Just imagine what elegantly simple protocols we would have if we required the descriptions to be in Morse code.
Good idea.
It's a better approach to enforce much simpler protocols.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.