 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:34:31AM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > The real reason to change the RFC format is that the IETF needs to make > a visible sign that it is capable of institutional change. Boy, I'm hoping that was a typo or rhetorical or something. Because as written it's pretty poorly reasoned. I'd prefer to make institutional changes only when they're needed for the good of the institution, not to prove that there's working process machinery. -- Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
Attachment:
pgpOfXAjcHzVp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.