![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Douglas Otis wrote: > this could also mean utilizing graphical characters to create > clean lines, boxes, and borders. This could be a matter of > the character-repertoire going beyond ASCII in conjunction > with a drawing application. This approach should permit a > simple translation back into ASCII-artwork for the ASCII only > version. This won't work. Forget it. The xml2rfc ASCII-approximations for Latin-1 and some additional windows-1252 characters are already dubious. Weird cp858 example added below, bye, Frank
Ú¿ ÉË» +-+ ÃÅ´ Ìι |+| ÀÁÙ Èʼ +-+Title: ASCII isn't the point here
┌┬┐ ╔╦╗ +-+ ├┼┤ ╠╬╣ |+| └┴┘ ╚╩╝ +-+
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.