Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Julian Mehnle writes:
> As my appeal[1] pointed out, at the time draft-lyon-senderid-core-00 was
> submitted for experimental status, there was no "running code" that
> actually interpreted "v=spf1" as "spf2.0/mfrom,pra".
Perhaps you shouldn't have said that. Sendmail's sid-milter has used
v=spf1 records for PRA checks since its initial release in August
2004. I don't know the date for draft-lyon-senderid-core-00, but I
believe it was well after August.
--
Dick St.Peters, stpeters at NetHeaven.com
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
