Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

[wayne <wayne at schlitt.net>]

In <17305.36224.584090.853821 at saint.heaven.net> "Dick St.Peters" <stpeters at NetHeaven.com> writes:

> Julian Mehnle writes:
>> As my appeal[1] pointed out, at the time draft-lyon-senderid-core-00 was 
>> submitted for experimental status, there was no "running code" that 
>> actually interpreted "v=spf1" as "spf2.0/mfrom,pra".
>
> Perhaps you shouldn't have said that.  Sendmail's sid-milter has used
> v=spf1 records for PRA checks since its initial release in August
> 2004.  I don't know the date for draft-lyon-senderid-core-00, but I
> believe it was well after August.

draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 was released on Sept 15th 2004, after the
consensus of the working group was that the SPFv1 records should not
be reused for SenderID.  So, yeah, there was a few weeks where the
Sendmail milter was within spec.


-wayne


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf