Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
In <4399C0C6.48EB at xyzzy.claranet.de> Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> writes:
> Result of this experiment (last state that I've heard of):
> Absolutely nobody evaluates "spf2.0/pra".
fyi;
There have been a couple of people who have run stats on the usage of
spf2.0/pra vs SPF. It *is* being used, but no where near as much as
SPF.
-wayne
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
